<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 23andMe Scientists Offer Solution to Apparent Mutation Rate Discrepancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/11/18/23andme-scientists-offer-solution-to-apparent-mutation-rate-discrepancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/11/18/23andme-scientists-offer-solution-to-apparent-mutation-rate-discrepancy/</link>
	<description>A receptacle for genetic knowledge.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EasternCleric</title>
		<link>http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/11/18/23andme-scientists-offer-solution-to-apparent-mutation-rate-discrepancy/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>EasternCleric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spittoon.23andme.com/?p=1980#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>The process of observing mutations over time yields lots of insight on human genetic diseases. Improvements in methods of timing seem very important. However, a recent article in Molecular Biology and Evolution, &quot;An Ancient Evolutionary Origin of Genes Associated with Human Genetic Diseases&quot; may indicate there is much less importance than might be initially expected.   It turns out that the majority of disease genes were already present in the eukaryotic ancestor, and the second largest number has arisen around the time of evolution of multicellularity.  Tomislav Dmazet-Loso and Diethard Tautz suggest that since 90% of disease genes have emerged before the bilaterian radiation, the better model for genetic study of these diseases would be nematodes or insects instead of humans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The process of observing mutations over time yields lots of insight on human genetic diseases. Improvements in methods of timing seem very important. However, a recent article in Molecular Biology and Evolution, &#8220;An Ancient Evolutionary Origin of Genes Associated with Human Genetic Diseases&#8221; may indicate there is much less importance than might be initially expected.   It turns out that the majority of disease genes were already present in the eukaryotic ancestor, and the second largest number has arisen around the time of evolution of multicellularity.  Tomislav Dmazet-Loso and Diethard Tautz suggest that since 90% of disease genes have emerged before the bilaterian radiation, the better model for genetic study of these diseases would be nematodes or insects instead of humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
