<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genetically Gauche?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/06/26/genetically-gauche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/06/26/genetically-gauche/</link>
	<description>A receptacle for genetic knowledge.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hproszen</title>
		<link>http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/06/26/genetically-gauche/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>hproszen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spittoon.23andme.com/?p=298#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Just thought I'd mention Michael Corballis is a New Zealander, not an Aussie. Apart from  that the description of his theory (or Annett's theory) doesn't sound quite right.

He and Annett both talk about a gene coming in 2 versions, one for right preference (R+ say), one for random preference (R-). The R- version is recessive and the R+ version is dominant.  

Since our genes come in pairs we might have:

R+  and  R+    - gives a right hander
R+ and R-       - gives a right hander (since R+ is dominant).
R- and R-        - randomly gives a right hander or a left hander.    

This is not a bad theory since it explains why 2 left-handed parents are likely to have about 50% right handed children, even though all the children would be expected to be R- and R-.

Annett may now have modified her theory - but this is the theory as stated in Corballis' book 'The Lop-sided Ape'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#8217;d mention Michael Corballis is a New Zealander, not an Aussie. Apart from  that the description of his theory (or Annett&#8217;s theory) doesn&#8217;t sound quite right.</p>
<p>He and Annett both talk about a gene coming in 2 versions, one for right preference (R+ say), one for random preference (R-). The R- version is recessive and the R+ version is dominant.  </p>
<p>Since our genes come in pairs we might have:</p>
<p>R+  and  R+    - gives a right hander<br />
R+ and R-       - gives a right hander (since R+ is dominant).<br />
R- and R-        - randomly gives a right hander or a left hander.    </p>
<p>This is not a bad theory since it explains why 2 left-handed parents are likely to have about 50% right handed children, even though all the children would be expected to be R- and R-.</p>
<p>Annett may now have modified her theory - but this is the theory as stated in Corballis&#8217; book &#8216;The Lop-sided Ape&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
